What are the challenges in population growth, and what are the factors that support a large population?
Q. 1. What are the challenges in population growth? 2. What are the factors that support a large population? The one who comes up with the most challenges and factors wins. Please feel free to define "total land" and "arable land" in population density. Thank you.
Asked by - - - Sun Sep 14 21:19:44 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1. Challenge is to support a large population 2. Factor is population growth.
Answered by No, I won't do your homework - Sun Sep 21 01:32:14 2008
Q. 1. What are the challenges in population growth? 2. What are the factors that support a large population? The one who comes up with the most challenges and factors wins. Please feel free to define "total land" and "arable land" in population density. Thank you.
Asked by - - - Sun Sep 14 21:19:44 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1. Challenge is to support a large population 2. Factor is population growth.
Answered by No, I won't do your homework - Sun Sep 21 01:32:14 2008
Is the worlds population now greater than the all of the past centuries populations combined?
Q. Is the worlds population now greater than the all of the past centuries populations combined? Just wondering...
Asked by Mike H - Fri Jun 20 01:40:04 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. No. There are around 6.5 billion people living right now but the total amount of humans who ever lived is around 100 billion
Answered by Voice of Insanity - Fri Jun 20 02:03:18 2008
Q. Is the worlds population now greater than the all of the past centuries populations combined? Just wondering...
Asked by Mike H - Fri Jun 20 01:40:04 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. No. There are around 6.5 billion people living right now but the total amount of humans who ever lived is around 100 billion
Answered by Voice of Insanity - Fri Jun 20 02:03:18 2008
What was the population of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland?
Q. It existed only from 1953-1963. I can't find anything online that lists the population of this country. Please list the population and the year it had that population. Thanks in advance.
Asked by LDB_Career - Tue Jun 26 21:38:31 2007 - - 2 Answers - 1 Comments
A. It had an estimated 7,000,000 in 1955 - according to the Historical Dictionary of the British Empire, by James Stuart Olson and Robert Shadle, p. 422. Sorry, the above is the best I could locate. ~~
Answered by . - Tue Jun 26 21:45:51 2007
Q. It existed only from 1953-1963. I can't find anything online that lists the population of this country. Please list the population and the year it had that population. Thanks in advance.
Asked by LDB_Career - Tue Jun 26 21:38:31 2007 - - 2 Answers - 1 Comments
A. It had an estimated 7,000,000 in 1955 - according to the Historical Dictionary of the British Empire, by James Stuart Olson and Robert Shadle, p. 422. Sorry, the above is the best I could locate. ~~
Answered by . - Tue Jun 26 21:45:51 2007
How does population growth affect the limitation of natural resources?
Q. I have that question and a couple more: How does population growth correspond with disease and poverty? What has the United Nations done to promote a reduction in population in the past five years?
Asked by help? - Mon May 18 21:07:55 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well population growth affects the limitation of natural resources because people need to use those resources and as more people are around more people are using those resources so eventually they will run out, like oil. Population growth corresponds with disease and poverty because when they're more people disease spreads from person to person faster because you are closer to people, it corresponds with poverty because a percentage of the population will always be living in poverty and when they're more people, more people will be living in poverty, if you mean growth of poverty it is because it is easier to monopolize the country and make lots of money that other people don't have. I'm not sure about the answer to your last question… [cont.]
Answered by unknown - Mon May 18 21:17:39 2009
Q. I have that question and a couple more: How does population growth correspond with disease and poverty? What has the United Nations done to promote a reduction in population in the past five years?
Asked by help? - Mon May 18 21:07:55 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well population growth affects the limitation of natural resources because people need to use those resources and as more people are around more people are using those resources so eventually they will run out, like oil. Population growth corresponds with disease and poverty because when they're more people disease spreads from person to person faster because you are closer to people, it corresponds with poverty because a percentage of the population will always be living in poverty and when they're more people, more people will be living in poverty, if you mean growth of poverty it is because it is easier to monopolize the country and make lots of money that other people don't have. I'm not sure about the answer to your last question… [cont.]
Answered by unknown - Mon May 18 21:17:39 2009
What percentage of the population preys upon the misfortune of others? To make money off of them?
Q. Does this trait come out in everyone or is it less the 50% of the population? I always thought that we should help the unfortunate and those in need myself. Have I been mislead? Is that not the norm?
Asked by Dawn - Mon Jul 6 02:46:57 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Selfishness and greed is an unfortunate trait of human imperfection, but it can be recognized, controlled and eventually done away with individually. However,the worldwide economical system has been set up on greed, to live off of others. It is based on greed and love of money, self interest. The hardworking "ordinary" person and those classified as minorities, for what ever reason, are pretty much the ones who get taken advantage of by a system that has been set up to cater to the "upper class big wheels" so to speak, while providing only crumbs for the ones who really deserve better for their efforts. Because of the love of money by the "big shots" of society and a greedy system, thousands of people every year are allowed to be homeless,… [cont.]
Answered by Camellia - Mon Jul 6 04:21:40 2009
Q. Does this trait come out in everyone or is it less the 50% of the population? I always thought that we should help the unfortunate and those in need myself. Have I been mislead? Is that not the norm?
Asked by Dawn - Mon Jul 6 02:46:57 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Selfishness and greed is an unfortunate trait of human imperfection, but it can be recognized, controlled and eventually done away with individually. However,the worldwide economical system has been set up on greed, to live off of others. It is based on greed and love of money, self interest. The hardworking "ordinary" person and those classified as minorities, for what ever reason, are pretty much the ones who get taken advantage of by a system that has been set up to cater to the "upper class big wheels" so to speak, while providing only crumbs for the ones who really deserve better for their efforts. Because of the love of money by the "big shots" of society and a greedy system, thousands of people every year are allowed to be homeless,… [cont.]
Answered by Camellia - Mon Jul 6 04:21:40 2009
How do I do this population growth problem, using the logistic equation, with differential equations?
Q. Consider a rabbit population P(t) satistying the logistic equation. If the intial population is 120 rabbits and there are 8 births per month and 6 deaths per month occurring at t=0, how many months does it take for P(t) to reach 95% of the limiting population M?
Asked by Larry L - Wed Nov 5 20:22:34 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The differential form of the logistic equation is: dP/dt = r*P - (r/M)*P^2 where P is the population as a function of time r is the growth rate M is the carrying capacity (the limiting population) In the above equation, the first term on the right hand side represents unfetttered exponential growth of a population (i.e., the birth rate), while the second term represents the effects of competition and death. We can equate the first term with the birth rate to find the value of r for this problem: 8 rabbits/month = r*P(0) = r*120 rabbits r = 1/(15 month) Now equate the second term with the death rate to find M: 6 rabbits/month = 1/((15 month)*M) * (120 rabbits)^2 M = 160 rabbits The solution to the logistic differential equation is: [cont.]
Answered by hfshaw - Thu Nov 6 16:13:49 2008
Q. Consider a rabbit population P(t) satistying the logistic equation. If the intial population is 120 rabbits and there are 8 births per month and 6 deaths per month occurring at t=0, how many months does it take for P(t) to reach 95% of the limiting population M?
Asked by Larry L - Wed Nov 5 20:22:34 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The differential form of the logistic equation is: dP/dt = r*P - (r/M)*P^2 where P is the population as a function of time r is the growth rate M is the carrying capacity (the limiting population) In the above equation, the first term on the right hand side represents unfetttered exponential growth of a population (i.e., the birth rate), while the second term represents the effects of competition and death. We can equate the first term with the birth rate to find the value of r for this problem: 8 rabbits/month = r*P(0) = r*120 rabbits r = 1/(15 month) Now equate the second term with the death rate to find M: 6 rabbits/month = 1/((15 month)*M) * (120 rabbits)^2 M = 160 rabbits The solution to the logistic differential equation is: [cont.]
Answered by hfshaw - Thu Nov 6 16:13:49 2008
What is the population of Cincinnati, Ohio at 12 noon on a work day?
Q. I know the population is about 320,000 but how many people go to Cincinnati to work? What is the population plus people that go there to work every day?
Asked by HellYes - Tue Dec 11 05:41:02 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I would say anywhere from 35000 to 4000
Answered by someone else - Tue Dec 11 09:55:26 2007
Q. I know the population is about 320,000 but how many people go to Cincinnati to work? What is the population plus people that go there to work every day?
Asked by HellYes - Tue Dec 11 05:41:02 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I would say anywhere from 35000 to 4000
Answered by someone else - Tue Dec 11 09:55:26 2007
What happened in 1750 for the worlds population to suddenly increase?
Q. 1 AD - Worlds population estimated at 250,000 million 1750 AD - World population estimated at 1 billion 2000 AD - World population estimated at 6 billion In the last 250 years the average yearly increase has gone from 428 million upto 20,000 million a year. What are the possible reasons for this? Im sure its not a specific year but in and around this time in history there seems to be a dramatic increase.
Asked by redmanshouts - Sat Apr 25 11:13:43 2009 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Two words: Industrial revolution. Technological advances which occurred as a result of the process of industrialisation meant that death rates fell and at the same time, birth rates remained high resulting in an increasing population. Why did death rates fall as a result of industrialisation? * Improved nutrition - The agricultural revolution accompanied the industrial revolution meaning that there was a better supply of food * Awareness of the causes of diseases such as cholera - which meant plans could be implemented to prevent them * More people were earning more money which improved their quality of life in terms of the food etc they could afford to buy
Answered by Moondance - Sat Apr 25 11:24:42 2009
Q. 1 AD - Worlds population estimated at 250,000 million 1750 AD - World population estimated at 1 billion 2000 AD - World population estimated at 6 billion In the last 250 years the average yearly increase has gone from 428 million upto 20,000 million a year. What are the possible reasons for this? Im sure its not a specific year but in and around this time in history there seems to be a dramatic increase.
Asked by redmanshouts - Sat Apr 25 11:13:43 2009 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Two words: Industrial revolution. Technological advances which occurred as a result of the process of industrialisation meant that death rates fell and at the same time, birth rates remained high resulting in an increasing population. Why did death rates fall as a result of industrialisation? * Improved nutrition - The agricultural revolution accompanied the industrial revolution meaning that there was a better supply of food * Awareness of the causes of diseases such as cholera - which meant plans could be implemented to prevent them * More people were earning more money which improved their quality of life in terms of the food etc they could afford to buy
Answered by Moondance - Sat Apr 25 11:24:42 2009
How large could a population grow from 120,000 over 400 years if it had three planets to grow on?
Q. Say there is a population of humans who have found three earth-like planets to live on. Over four hundred years, how big would the population get if it had that much room to expand? Thanks, everyone!
Asked by Writer in Need - Mon May 11 01:06:49 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. What I did when I was writing my SF novel was to think of the USA. If you take what happened from 1492 to the present and find out the current population of the US it could give you a rough template to work on. But remember that their may be other factors in your futuristic tale that might impact on your eventual population. And I suppose you have to ask yourself the question of whether or not you should go into such detail at the outset. I did not mention a number but did state that many billions had made their home there. So there are ways of working around using an exact figure unless of course it has a significant bearing on the story. Hope this helps a bit. Good luck.
Answered by Captain Conundrum - Mon May 11 01:15:49 2009
Q. Say there is a population of humans who have found three earth-like planets to live on. Over four hundred years, how big would the population get if it had that much room to expand? Thanks, everyone!
Asked by Writer in Need - Mon May 11 01:06:49 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. What I did when I was writing my SF novel was to think of the USA. If you take what happened from 1492 to the present and find out the current population of the US it could give you a rough template to work on. But remember that their may be other factors in your futuristic tale that might impact on your eventual population. And I suppose you have to ask yourself the question of whether or not you should go into such detail at the outset. I did not mention a number but did state that many billions had made their home there. So there are ways of working around using an exact figure unless of course it has a significant bearing on the story. Hope this helps a bit. Good luck.
Answered by Captain Conundrum - Mon May 11 01:15:49 2009
Why did the population of Mauritius begin to grow so rapidly in the mid 20th century?
Q. Also, what seemed likely to happen in the future if something wasn't done to solve the problem? What did the government do to reduce the rate of population growth and increase resources? What does the future hold for Mauritius and it's people? (Geography homework!) Thanks.
Asked by Tilly - Tue Feb 3 06:07:14 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1) Baby Boom, due to the end of the war, like everywhere else. This was couple with increased prosperity for its people. 2) Seemed likely that there would soon be increased poverty, land scarcity (it is a small island!), and mass unemployment. 3) agressive family Planning incentives. Free community clinics tpo educate the population as to contraception. 4) The future was looking very bright until a few years ago. Mauritius had only functional unemployment (around 3%). However, inflation is causing havoc to its people's buying power. Moreover, the current economic crisis is adversely affecting one of its main revenue sources, Tourism
Answered by PhoenixRising - Thu Feb 5 01:22:05 2009
Q. Also, what seemed likely to happen in the future if something wasn't done to solve the problem? What did the government do to reduce the rate of population growth and increase resources? What does the future hold for Mauritius and it's people? (Geography homework!) Thanks.
Asked by Tilly - Tue Feb 3 06:07:14 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1) Baby Boom, due to the end of the war, like everywhere else. This was couple with increased prosperity for its people. 2) Seemed likely that there would soon be increased poverty, land scarcity (it is a small island!), and mass unemployment. 3) agressive family Planning incentives. Free community clinics tpo educate the population as to contraception. 4) The future was looking very bright until a few years ago. Mauritius had only functional unemployment (around 3%). However, inflation is causing havoc to its people's buying power. Moreover, the current economic crisis is adversely affecting one of its main revenue sources, Tourism
Answered by PhoenixRising - Thu Feb 5 01:22:05 2009
What percentage of New York City population is white?
Q. What is the percentage of whites in New York City? Or, what is the population of whites in NYC? If possible, please mention the neighbourhoods with considerable white populations. A friend of mine wants to know this. Thank You.
Asked by Silence - Sun Dec 14 10:44:42 2008 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. tell your frend to keep her butt in idaho
Answered by training day - Sun Dec 14 11:06:18 2008
Q. What is the percentage of whites in New York City? Or, what is the population of whites in NYC? If possible, please mention the neighbourhoods with considerable white populations. A friend of mine wants to know this. Thank You.
Asked by Silence - Sun Dec 14 10:44:42 2008 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. tell your frend to keep her butt in idaho
Answered by training day - Sun Dec 14 11:06:18 2008
What was the population density of the Roman Empire at various points throughout history?
Q. Just curious about Rome's population per square km at various points throughout history. If anyone has a helpful link or knows what I'm looking for, that would be great.
Asked by Michael - Wed Jan 7 20:16:27 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. directly from wikipedia Population - 25 BC est. 56,800,000 Density 20.7 /km (53.5 /sq mi) - 117 est. 88,000,000 Density 17.6 /km (45.6 /sq mi)
Answered by proteacher@ymail.com - Wed Jan 7 20:28:35 2009
Q. Just curious about Rome's population per square km at various points throughout history. If anyone has a helpful link or knows what I'm looking for, that would be great.
Asked by Michael - Wed Jan 7 20:16:27 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. directly from wikipedia Population - 25 BC est. 56,800,000 Density 20.7 /km (53.5 /sq mi) - 117 est. 88,000,000 Density 17.6 /km (45.6 /sq mi)
Answered by proteacher@ymail.com - Wed Jan 7 20:28:35 2009
What would the population equal from the start of evolution and would it make evolution untrue?
Q. If you calculate population from 500,000 years ago the population today should equal a lot higher population so how can evolution stand true if it accured so long ago
Asked by jshleejsh - Sat Nov 8 19:04:11 2008 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
A. This is an old, lame argument sometimes called "the bunny blunder." It's been soundly debunked enough times so that any individual or any website still supporting it can immediately be labeled as spurious and deceptive. "[The] population argument fails on many different criteria. Honest creationists should eschew its use."
Answered by don - Wed Nov 12 11:21:35 2008
Q. If you calculate population from 500,000 years ago the population today should equal a lot higher population so how can evolution stand true if it accured so long ago
Asked by jshleejsh - Sat Nov 8 19:04:11 2008 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
A. This is an old, lame argument sometimes called "the bunny blunder." It's been soundly debunked enough times so that any individual or any website still supporting it can immediately be labeled as spurious and deceptive. "[The] population argument fails on many different criteria. Honest creationists should eschew its use."
Answered by don - Wed Nov 12 11:21:35 2008
What is the human population compared to other animals?
Q. Rough estimate? For the purposes of this question, let's say vertebrates on up to more highly evolved species. What fraction of the population is "us"?
Asked by clueless - Sun Jun 14 22:07:09 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It all depends on what you mean by 'population'. If you mean numbers, then we think we know there are approaching 7 billion people on earth (human population estimates are far less accurate than the UN would have us believe) -- all you have to do is research the numbers of any other species with which you want to compare us. However, that might not be what you should be doing: if you want to gauge environmental impact, then you need to assess biomass, being the weight of animals present: a man might, for example, eat as much and put out as much carbon dioxide as say a hundred rats, or a fifth of a cow (or whatever). It all depends why you're making the comparison. As to what fraction is 'us', we're both a herbivore and a carnivore… [cont.]
Answered by Freediver - Thu Jun 18 10:32:28 2009
Q. Rough estimate? For the purposes of this question, let's say vertebrates on up to more highly evolved species. What fraction of the population is "us"?
Asked by clueless - Sun Jun 14 22:07:09 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It all depends on what you mean by 'population'. If you mean numbers, then we think we know there are approaching 7 billion people on earth (human population estimates are far less accurate than the UN would have us believe) -- all you have to do is research the numbers of any other species with which you want to compare us. However, that might not be what you should be doing: if you want to gauge environmental impact, then you need to assess biomass, being the weight of animals present: a man might, for example, eat as much and put out as much carbon dioxide as say a hundred rats, or a fifth of a cow (or whatever). It all depends why you're making the comparison. As to what fraction is 'us', we're both a herbivore and a carnivore… [cont.]
Answered by Freediver - Thu Jun 18 10:32:28 2009
How would you figure out a future population?
Q. Let's say the Catholic population in France is 51,600,000 and the Muslim population is 8,400,000, the Muslim population currently grows at 2.3 percent a year, and the Catholic population grows at 0.03 percent per year, how do you find out what percent Catholic the population will be in the year 2100? Or what other information do I need, and how can I calculate it?
Asked by Carrie Sutherland - Sun Oct 1 02:33:13 2006 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You need to know the catholic population in 2100 and the muslim population in 2100. To calculate the catholic pop: Pop(c,2100) = Pop(c,now) * (1 + catholic growth rate)^94 Pop(c,2100) = 51,600,000 * (1.0003)^94 = 53,075,607 To calculate the muslim pop: Pop(m,2100) = Pop(m,now) * (1 + muslim growth rate)^94 Pop(m,2100) = 8,400,000 * (1.0230)^94 = 71,217,849 Catholic pop percentage in 2100: Pop%cath = Pop(c,2100) / [Total Population] Pop%cath = Pop(c,2100) / [Pop(c,2100) + Pop (m,2100)] Pop%cath = 53,075,607 / [53,075,607 + 71,217849] Pop%cath = 42.7%
Answered by Yahooracle - Sun Oct 1 02:42:27 2006
Q. Let's say the Catholic population in France is 51,600,000 and the Muslim population is 8,400,000, the Muslim population currently grows at 2.3 percent a year, and the Catholic population grows at 0.03 percent per year, how do you find out what percent Catholic the population will be in the year 2100? Or what other information do I need, and how can I calculate it?
Asked by Carrie Sutherland - Sun Oct 1 02:33:13 2006 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You need to know the catholic population in 2100 and the muslim population in 2100. To calculate the catholic pop: Pop(c,2100) = Pop(c,now) * (1 + catholic growth rate)^94 Pop(c,2100) = 51,600,000 * (1.0003)^94 = 53,075,607 To calculate the muslim pop: Pop(m,2100) = Pop(m,now) * (1 + muslim growth rate)^94 Pop(m,2100) = 8,400,000 * (1.0230)^94 = 71,217,849 Catholic pop percentage in 2100: Pop%cath = Pop(c,2100) / [Total Population] Pop%cath = Pop(c,2100) / [Pop(c,2100) + Pop (m,2100)] Pop%cath = 53,075,607 / [53,075,607 + 71,217849] Pop%cath = 42.7%
Answered by Yahooracle - Sun Oct 1 02:42:27 2006
What percent of the US population is invested in the markets?
Q. What number, as a precent of the entire US population, is currently invested in US economic markets? And how has this percent chagned over time? Sources/links would be appreciated. Thanks!
Asked by Mammatus - Wed Oct 4 17:00:47 2006 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. This article will give you an idea of how many people trade online:
Answered by dredude52 - Wed Oct 4 19:58:54 2006
Q. What number, as a precent of the entire US population, is currently invested in US economic markets? And how has this percent chagned over time? Sources/links would be appreciated. Thanks!
Asked by Mammatus - Wed Oct 4 17:00:47 2006 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. This article will give you an idea of how many people trade online:
Answered by dredude52 - Wed Oct 4 19:58:54 2006
How big of a population can the world support resource wize, without harming the animal population, or how?
Q. or how big of a population can the world's farms support. Or what is the actual most enjoyable population for the world. or how big of a population can the world's farms support. Or what is the actual most enjoyable population for the world with the population being big and no wars.
Asked by Matt M - Sat Apr 26 12:24:32 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. So are you talking about a Utopian model, a Communist model, or what? First you need to get a new species of humans. The ones I know have canine teeth, which are just wonderful for eating meat. Once you have bred these cow-people, the question is what are you going to do to keep the rest of the animal population in check? If the animal population is not to be harmed, that means that we are not using pesticides and we are letting other animals eat our crops. I'm guessing that the answer is 0.
Answered by No, I won't do your homework - Sat Apr 26 19:58:45 2008
Q. or how big of a population can the world's farms support. Or what is the actual most enjoyable population for the world. or how big of a population can the world's farms support. Or what is the actual most enjoyable population for the world with the population being big and no wars.
Asked by Matt M - Sat Apr 26 12:24:32 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. So are you talking about a Utopian model, a Communist model, or what? First you need to get a new species of humans. The ones I know have canine teeth, which are just wonderful for eating meat. Once you have bred these cow-people, the question is what are you going to do to keep the rest of the animal population in check? If the animal population is not to be harmed, that means that we are not using pesticides and we are letting other animals eat our crops. I'm guessing that the answer is 0.
Answered by No, I won't do your homework - Sat Apr 26 19:58:45 2008
How is the increase of population numbers the biggest challenge the world currently faces?
Q. How is the increase of population numbers the biggest challenge the world currently faces?
Asked by C K - Fri Nov 28 01:27:00 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It's a serious problem because of the resources they require. It's a challenge, because it's going to take decades to fix the problem, during which time the problem will get much worse. There's nothing (ethical) we can do to reduce the population, all we can do is try to reduce the fertility rate. To reduce the fertility rate, we have to improve the standard of living in LDCs, because having many children is a matter of redundancy. There are also cultural issues, e.g. "be fruitful and multiply" and some African cultures where a girl must prove her fertility before she can be married. There's a bit of a Catch-22 there though, because when the standard of living is increased, that includes increased longevity, so each person drains… [cont.]
Answered by Elmyr - Fri Nov 28 01:53:17 2008
Q. How is the increase of population numbers the biggest challenge the world currently faces?
Asked by C K - Fri Nov 28 01:27:00 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It's a serious problem because of the resources they require. It's a challenge, because it's going to take decades to fix the problem, during which time the problem will get much worse. There's nothing (ethical) we can do to reduce the population, all we can do is try to reduce the fertility rate. To reduce the fertility rate, we have to improve the standard of living in LDCs, because having many children is a matter of redundancy. There are also cultural issues, e.g. "be fruitful and multiply" and some African cultures where a girl must prove her fertility before she can be married. There's a bit of a Catch-22 there though, because when the standard of living is increased, that includes increased longevity, so each person drains… [cont.]
Answered by Elmyr - Fri Nov 28 01:53:17 2008
What is the projected population of a school?
Q. In school year 1996 - 1997, the population of our school is 1020. Then in school year 2006 - 2007 it goes up to 1210. What would be its population in school year 2011 - 2012? What is the formula in finding the projected population?
Asked by Harry Ian John - Mon Mar 26 01:46:36 2007 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Since you only have 2 points, I am assuming that you have to use a linear model for the population. So anyways, you assume that the population can be described by a line y = mx+b. You have to find m and b. y is the population and x is the year. to find m, you have to find the rise/run. rise is difference in population (190) and run is difference in year (10), so slope is 19. Now you have to find b, to do this you can put in any of the values you have above. y = 19x + b put in the first value: 1020 = 19 * 1996 + b 1020 = 37924 + b b = -36904. so y = 19x - 36904 put 2006 in it and you get: y = 19 * 2006 - 36904 y = 38114 - 36904 y = 1210. and put 2011 and you get y = 19*2011 - 36904 y = 1305
Answered by someguy - Mon Mar 26 02:00:58 2007
Q. In school year 1996 - 1997, the population of our school is 1020. Then in school year 2006 - 2007 it goes up to 1210. What would be its population in school year 2011 - 2012? What is the formula in finding the projected population?
Asked by Harry Ian John - Mon Mar 26 01:46:36 2007 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Since you only have 2 points, I am assuming that you have to use a linear model for the population. So anyways, you assume that the population can be described by a line y = mx+b. You have to find m and b. y is the population and x is the year. to find m, you have to find the rise/run. rise is difference in population (190) and run is difference in year (10), so slope is 19. Now you have to find b, to do this you can put in any of the values you have above. y = 19x + b put in the first value: 1020 = 19 * 1996 + b 1020 = 37924 + b b = -36904. so y = 19x - 36904 put 2006 in it and you get: y = 19 * 2006 - 36904 y = 38114 - 36904 y = 1210. and put 2011 and you get y = 19*2011 - 36904 y = 1305
Answered by someguy - Mon Mar 26 02:00:58 2007
How do farmers increase the population of their livestock and poultry and other domesticated animals?
Q. I have read in the book that the population of domesticated animals has grown. But how? It seems very interesting.
Asked by Esoj - Fri Nov 16 03:34:05 2007 - - 3 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Very simple task. For poultry for example: A hen and a rooster to mate can reproduce in a month or two and can add 10 or more population at a time. Hens can lay more than 10 eggs and hatches to bring new hicks in 21 days and after a short period goes on egg laying again. The chicks grow fast and sexually matures in about 18-20 weeks. In a year, the population can grow in hundreds provide the chickens are properly cared - good environment, sufficient feedings,protected from predators,etc. For livestock: For example- Raise female cattles and breed them (artificial insemination are more successful). In a year, one female cattle delivers one or two. And the cycle goes on repeating increasing the population. For other domesticated animals… [cont.]
Answered by lani s - Fri Nov 16 05:48:42 2007
Q. I have read in the book that the population of domesticated animals has grown. But how? It seems very interesting.
Asked by Esoj - Fri Nov 16 03:34:05 2007 - - 3 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Very simple task. For poultry for example: A hen and a rooster to mate can reproduce in a month or two and can add 10 or more population at a time. Hens can lay more than 10 eggs and hatches to bring new hicks in 21 days and after a short period goes on egg laying again. The chicks grow fast and sexually matures in about 18-20 weeks. In a year, the population can grow in hundreds provide the chickens are properly cared - good environment, sufficient feedings,protected from predators,etc. For livestock: For example- Raise female cattles and breed them (artificial insemination are more successful). In a year, one female cattle delivers one or two. And the cycle goes on repeating increasing the population. For other domesticated animals… [cont.]
Answered by lani s - Fri Nov 16 05:48:42 2007
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'population'
Tue Jul 14 03:02:56 2009 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
Police Change Likely To Trim Jail Population
Harrisonburg Daily News Record
harrisonburg - A change to a federal program that the Rockingham County Sheriff's Office participates in may reduce the number of illegal ...
and more »
Harrisonburg Daily News Record
harrisonburg - A change to a federal program that the Rockingham County Sheriff's Office participates in may reduce the number of illegal ...
and more »
britains swan population explosion threatens food supply for fish 9 jpg
235px x 350px | 13.50kB
[source page]
Great news for Conservationists Though currently under protection by the Royal Charter the swan population in Britain is found to be increasing exponentially But as The Independent
235px x 350px | 13.50kB
[source page]
Great news for Conservationists Though currently under protection by the Royal Charter the swan population in Britain is found to be increasing exponentially But as The Independent
Population Connection: Domestic Terror on the Rise
Population Connection
Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:30:00 GM
four children, and ten grandchildren Dr. Tiller leaves behind. And I am heartbroken to be reminded yet again, and in such a tragic way, that our fight for reproductive autonomy is not over. Posted by . Population. Connection at 2:30 PM ...
Population Connection
Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:30:00 GM
four children, and ten grandchildren Dr. Tiller leaves behind. And I am heartbroken to be reminded yet again, and in such a tragic way, that our fight for reproductive autonomy is not over. Posted by . Population. Connection at 2:30 PM ...
[Hide]▲


